History based on the life of the original Macbeth Essay

Eleventh century Scotland was a vicious and grieved nation. Family and as far as anyone knows faithful companions opposed each other for exchanging and domain purposes. The dangers of an adversary intrusion or an assault on fortifications were very normal. Wild Vikings and nearby Scottish men attacked continually to debilitate and all the more significantly drive out the obstinate restricting powers that lay in their manner. Macbeth was naturally introduced to this hazardous condition in 1005, child of the triumphant family that stepped its clout on ‘Moray’ and ‘Ross’ [significant zones in Scotland]. The family itself deceived themselves as being cherishing and minding to each other, in any case, inside they were scarred intellectually, as an outcome of their father’s passing who was clearly killed by his cousins. Macbeth clearly genuinely occupied by his father’s passing, focused his musings on driving a relatively typical life, upheld by ‘Brauch’ his new accomplice [granddaughter to a ‘High King of Scotland’]. Along these lines they had no offspring of their own. The current leader of Scotland was Duncan, an incapable and apparently disliked individual in the midst of the common issues. Of course somebody killed him at the age of thirty-eight. History specialists accept that it might have really been Macbeth, however there is no convincing proof to affirm their hypotheses. Macbeth took advantage of this extraordinary lucky break, and was chosen ‘High King of Scotland’ in 1040; he controlled for a long time. As antecedent of the scolded Duncan, his main goal during his underlying ten years in power, was to carry harmony and relative security to his tricky realm, remarkably he was genuinely effective at doing as such; he turned into a changing King in like manner. He figured out how to adjust and demolish most of the negative sentiments among the populace. Sadly for him, his most prominent and most deadly obstacle appeared in the structure Duncan’s child Malcolm, who was totally resolved to assume responsibility for Scotland. He keenly attacked the district in 1054, helped by the English King ‘Edward the Confessor’. Macbeth himself was ruthlessly eliminated on the fifteenth of August 1057 at ‘Peel Ring Lumphanan’ in ‘Mar’. He was covered at Iona, individually; the consecrated internment spot of the Kings of Scotland. Was this epic time of Scottish History the reason for Shakespeare ‘Macbeth’? Shakespeare was a skilled dramatist, not a history specialist. In any case, the past gives a superb source to basing a thriving play. It is energizing verifiable material with which [if one is mentally sound], can alter and adjust to evoke most extreme sensational impact and a genuinely splendid and engaging ‘stage production’. Authentic proof offers scholars with a productive foundation; an inventive base on which one can build a refined plot that lures the audience’s brain, body and soul. For Shakespeare this would have been extraordinarily hard to begin, henceforth the social event beneath the platform; that were either damn right impolite or completely sloshed. Without a doubt, it is consistent with state that a portion of his dramatizations were not as acknowledged or predominant, luckily Macbeth demonstrated unique, and would be a common showy creation for many years. Shakespeare was an autonomous character, one who blossomed with his very own accomplishment, and one who was not hesitant to modify and build up specific highlights in regards to a story to achieve extreme emotional impact. The focal point of Macbeth turned around the eleventh century precursors; he clearly recognized the incredible potential in these characters. He obviously figured it important to change over, create and cancel specific qualities encompassing the occasions of eleventh century Scotland. He set up ‘Lady Macbeth’s’ sleepwalking and demise, the meal scene and Banquo’s apparition, and a large portion of the cauldron scene. With a little creative mind and adjustment he switched King Duncan’s dreadful character into a cherished and extraordinarily refreshing ‘role model’. He likewise dispensed with Macbeth’s ten years of good principle to make the situation and environment progressively viable; all that he intentionally modified was in light of a legitimate concern for the play. Strangely, King James I was in power, when Shakespeare previously introduced Macbeth in 1603. I for one discover this fairly fascinating, on the grounds that the genuine storyline comprises of huge numbers of King James’s individual solaces and interests. Clearly King James was an unrivaled impact on the result of the play; he assists with conjuring up some productive motivation for Shakespeare; this, and the beautiful Scottish spend times, gives a blowout of data and thoughts for Shakespeare to weave his enchantment upon. He appreciatively acknowledged this inestimable blessing, and changed it into probably the best catastrophe this world has actually ever experienced. What message is Shakespeare attempting to get over? I feel it significant for one and me to comprehend that the play is seriously established on the ‘corruption of power’. In spite of the fact that the heavenly, captivating people and secretive endeavors make a one of a kind environment to the play, the core comprises off occasions that spin around the maltreatment of intensity. It is consistent with state this is available and occurring in our advanced society, take ‘Hitler’ for instance. He was a despot who had a deadly measure of intensity, he utilized it to condition individuals, so he could do what he needed. He began by clearing out a whole race, known as the ‘Jews’; he and his obsession to be in charge was a main consideration in setting off the Second World War. A correlation can be made among him and Macbeth, the two of which mishandled their power. Shakespeare is attempting to get this prominent message across to his watchers. Black magic and Murderous Schemes. On the off chance that one knows about the catastrophe, one will realize that Shakespeare composed and guided it, at once in which murders and black magic were ordinary issues. Truth be told, most of the overall population truly accepted and dreaded the paranormal universe, to such an extent, people who were believed to be genuine witches were attempted, tried and in the long run slaughtered. During this time, ‘witch mania’ arrived at alarming extents; many guiltless individuals [usually women] were sentenced to quick execution, without a sufficient evaluation. As envisioned, a little minority were against this mass abuse, yet they and their reasonable feelings were choked without due thought by the main part of the overall population. Exposition Targets. Macbeth has muddled plots that include various acts and scenes. I am endeavoring to devise an article concentrating on three explicit scenes. The paper is to be written in a ‘director’s purpose of view’ †as though I was to coordinate these three chose scenes: Act I, Scene 3. Act I, Scene 5. Act 5, Scene 5. I feel that these three scenes on the whole portray the essential story and defeat of Macbeth himself. Act I, Scene 3 †meets the witches, which impacts his choice to execute the lord. Act I, Scene 5 †Lady Macbeth plots to execute Duncan herself and trusts her contemplations in Macbeth. Act 5, Scene 5 †As an outcome of his homicides, everything has caused issues down the road for him. He is going to be assaulted by the English armed force, and definitely faces the unequivocal discipline for his sins†¦ Death!!! I regard every scene to be off significant significance, all autonomously help to create and represent the general account as well. Obviously, every one must be coordinated properly, to accomplish the audiences’ fixation, and to only make them philosophize about the story. An enchanting area is likewise totally important, the crowd should be typified by the setting and conditions. The accompanying article signifies every scene self-rulingly, and communicates my emotions and perspectives on how I should direct and lead each of the three scenes to accomplish a shocking environment to hypnotize and astonish the onlookers. My fundamental target is to control chosen characters and change their character and disposition to improve the play and misrepresent the frightfulness subject. The way that Shakespeare himself, left no stage bearings leaves the entryway open for any willing direct to decipher the genuine play, as he/she needs. Throughout the hundreds of years, a few makers have conceived their own strategy and built up the plot to make their own interpretation of the baffling endeavors of the Scottish chain of importance. I have submitted my play and exposition to a ‘film production’. I have decided to embrace this specific strategy, since I feel that it would fit consummately into an advanced film, which has the assets and innovation to help realistic and reasonable enhancements. I have watched an advanced translation of the play; it was organized on an unpleasant Birmingham bequest. For some peculiar explanation however, the on-screen characters alluded to the immediate content, yet passed on them in a ‘Brummie’ emphasize; this was truly merciless. It just didn't supplement Shakespeare’s’ flighty language, the articulation was dreadful decidedly negative. I then again consider it progressively fitting to make the epic story out of Macbeth’s defeat in its indigenous and conventional age. Director’s perspective for Act I, Scene 3. Synopsis of scene: Macbeth and Banquo meet the witches, Macbeth is coming back from the fight with his courageous buddy and healthy Scottish aristocrat, Banquo. Their excursion back to the King’s camp takes them over an abandoned heath. Here, the witches lie in hang tight for them, talking as they for the most part do about a malevolent spell they have given occasion to feel qualms about one awful individual. The fog clears Macbe

Scarlet Letter Essays (954 words) - English-language Films

Red Letter The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorn starts by managing Hester Prynne's wrongdoing and sentence. She demonstrates herself to be a pleased lady by they way she weaves her splendid red A with brilliant string to be shown to her network. She is a talented needle worker and she doesn't appear, in spite of her disrespect, to be hesitant to show that about herself. At the point when she strolled down the road from the jail to the framework, the storyteller discusses her acknowledgment of how silly and fainthearted she would be if she somehow managed to attempt to shroud her imprint with the result of her wrongdoing, her child young lady. She carts away her underlying sentence of being exhibited on the framework with however much poise as could reasonably be expected for anybody in such a circumstance. The responses of the individuals were intriguing to me; their solid emotions against Hester being allowed to live alarmed me. I understood what a kind of culture and religion administered in those occasions. Additionally, I proved unable very envision being in Hester's situation with the sort of disrespect she was confronted with. The storyteller portrays Hester as thoroughly losing her womanly intrigue also, excellence over the seven years of judgment. Roger Chillingworth befuddled me significantly until close to the finish of the book. At the point when he visited Hester I was astonished that he needed to treat her as opposed to attempting to hurt her, yet at that point later understood his thought processes. He needed nobody in the network to discover that there was any connection among Hester and himself whatsoever; hurting her would have raised doubts. This was essential to his arrangement of retribution on Mr. Dimmesdale. From the start I believed that Chillingworth may have attempted to look for retribution against Hester, however then arrived at the resolution that he saw her open disrespect as more discipline than he would ever have overseen. Chillingworth's retribution was exceptionally smart. Everybody in the town knew and regarded him and this helped him gain companionship with Dimmesdale. Despite the fact that I didn't comprehend from the start that Chillingworth was really harming Dimmesdale while he should be treating him, this part of his retribution appeared well and good, as I got further into the book. Its pitilessness was awful, however it achieved his objective of tormenting him while he ought to have taken his legitimate discipline for the wrongdoing he submitted from the earliest starting point. My assessment of Arthur Dimmesdale changed all in all a bit from when I was first acquainted with him until the finish of the book. From the start I imagined that he was a chilly coldblooded, fearful man for not taking his piece of the fault in the two-sided wrongdoing of infidelity. His moves constrained Hester to make the entirety of the disrespect on herself. I accept that her disfavor was expanded since there was no subsequent individual to take some of it. The townspeople took a gander at her as if she had carried out the wrongdoing without anyone else. The measure of blame that Dimmesdale conveyed with him for not admitting immediately was remarkable. The more he paused, the harder it became for him to admit, the more his blame developed, and the simpler it was for Chillingworth to torment him. The reality that he turned out to be truly debilitated with blame astounded me, particularly since I didn't understand that piece of his ailment was credited to Chillingworth until some other time. His vigil and meeting with Hester and Pearl very early on the platform was the defining moment of my impression of him. Pearl's job in the story, I felt, was the red letter wake up. This is appeared in a few ways. She is a result of what Hester's red A speaks to and is for the most part wearing shades of red. She is depicted as having tricky characteristics about her. Mythical people are most usually thought to be fiendish and underhanded, which are both qualities of the infidelity the red letter speaks to. As I would like to think, the most fascinating part of Pearl's character is her response to seeing her mother without her image and top when she meets with Mr. Dimmesdale in the woods. She acted as though she didn't consider Hester her mom without the red An on her dress, similar to she cherished the A more than Hester. The finish of the story started with Hester's choice to uncover Roger Chillingworth's personality to Mr. Dimmesdale. This choice is shown up at after Hester attempts to persuade Chillingworth to end his retribution on Dimmesdale. His refusal to do so persuades Hester of what she needs to

Authentic Leadership Guide Definitions, Qualities, Pros Cons, Examples

Authentic Leadership Guide Definitions, Qualities, Pros Cons, Examples “Authentic leadership is leading adaptively from your core, choosing who you’re most inspired to be to serve the greatest good in this moment.” â€" Henna InamThe modern corporate world is not without its examples of wrongdoing and creed-based behavior. Not all leaders are good and acknowledgement of this can often be the first step towards better leadership. In order to lead better, leaders and academics have turned to the idea of authentic leadership. A leadership model, which believes that genuine leadership that basis its decisions on values can guide people towards the greater good. © Shutterstock | racornThis guide will examine authentic leadership: the past and the present context. We’ll explore the core elements of the model and the characteristics that define authentic leaders. We’ll explain the benefits and the shortcomings of the theory, before providing you examples of leaders who’ve showcased authentic leadership.UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENT CONTEXTS OF AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIPAuthentic leadership is a rather new theory, yet the core ideas of the leadership model can be traced back to Ancient Greece. In this section, we’ll explore the historical ideas behind the theory, before examining the modern theoretical approach to the leadership style and the implications of it being a young theory.The historical contextAuthentic leadership is another concept with roots in Ancient Greek philosophy. Ancient Greek philosophers concurred authenticity to be an important state of being, as it emphasized being in control of your own destiny and who you truly are as a person. The word authentic comes from the Greek word, authentikos, which means principal or genuine. Authentic persons were true themselves and their surroundings.Furthermore, authenticity was closely linked to the Ancient Greek model of cardinal virtues. To the Greeks, there were four key virtues to follow: prudence,  temperance, justice and fortitude. The virtues called the person to:Consider all the possible courses of action and acting in a fair-minded manner (prudence)Stay emotionally balanced and in control at all times (temperance)Deal with other people in a fair manner (justice)Have enough courage to do the right thing (fortitude)By developing these virtues, people were thought to improve their inner self and the relationships they had with other people. An authentic leader, therefore, needed the four virtues in order to lead in a just and good manner. To the Ancient Greeks, authentic leadership was moral and selfless to a degree.Ancient Greek philosophers weren’t the la st to explore the concept of authenticity. Throughout the human history, philosophers, musicians and artists have explored this concept. In the Western world, some of the most famous minds have talked about authenticity and authentic behavior. Descartes suggested authenticity is the following of your inner voice, which calls for responsible behavior. Identity was the thing that shaped Descartes’ individual morality and this identity came from external sources and social status. Authentic behavior was therefore often a natural existence, which was available for us all.Yet, authentic leadership wasn’t part of the conversation of leadership theories until much later. In the 1960s, authentic leadership entered the discussion and its inclusion was mostly driven by the need to reflect on certain negative elements the rising corporate culture had brought about.In the early stages of the theorizing, authenticity became attached as a reflection of organizations as well as individuals. An organization could start highlighting its authenticity by acting in a responsible manner, reacting to uncertainty and being creative. Authentic behavior moved away from the idea it’s only the individual leaders, who define authenticity within an organization.The modern contextAlthough the conversation around authenticity within the corporate culture began in the 1960s, it took a while before the concept was fully explored as a leadership model. Warren Bennis’ On Becoming a Leader explored certain elements of the authentic leadership model in 1989. The book has been re-printed several times since and in his latest introduction to the newest version in 2009, Bennis wrote, “Authentic leaders embrace those who speak valuable truths, however hard they are to hear”. He saw the problems of organizations often stemming from doing the opposite of that â€" hiding the truth, in order to avoid having to deal with problems. To Bennis, leaders were made and not born, suggesting that auth entic leadership is at the grasp of everyone.While Bennis’ original book did touch on the ideas of modern authentic leadership theory, the father of the idea is often considered Bill George, Harvard professor and CEO of Medtronic. George published a book called Authentic Leadership in 2003 and later refined his ideas further in True North. George’s inspiration for writing the book had been the increasing negative corporate examples, such as Enron and Tyco. He wanted to restore people’s faith in corporations and show young leaders another way to lead. Peter Northouse’s 2007 book Leadership: Theory and Practice wrote about the scandals and their influence on leadership theories. According to Northouse,“People feel apprehensive and insecure about what is going on around them, and as a result, they long for bona fide leadership they can trust and for leaders who are honest and good”.In Authentic Leadership, George described authentic leaders as:“People of the highest integ rity, committed to building organizations…who have a deep sense of purpose and are true to their core values who have the courage to build their companies to meet the needs of all their stakeholders, and who recognize the importance of their service to society.”A year after Authentic Leadership was published, the conversation got busier and the Gallup Leadership Institute of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln held its inaugural summit on Authentic Leadership Development. In 2007, George’s True North went further to explain who’s an authentic leader and what leaders can do to be more authentic, creating a concept that could be further refined, but also tested.The book restated the idea that leadership is not something you are born with, but that authentic leadership, especially, requires constant development and growth. George developed an idea of leadership as a journey, with three distinct phases:Phase 1: In the first part of your journey, you prepare yourself for the leade rship.Phase 2: In the second phase, you start leading by taking on new challenges until you reach the ‘peak’ of leadership.Phase 3: In the final part of the leadership journey, you start seeking opportunities to spread your leadership wisdom to others and give back to the community, even though the learning process continues.You can see what the journey looks like in the below chart: Source: Bill George’s websiteA theory in its infancyAuthentic leadership is in its infancy, which means the concept still lacks certain universal answers or theories to specific questions. As we will explore in the section about the advantages and disadvantages of the theory, the lack of proper theory or model is sometimes criticized as the biggest flaw of the idea.But the core ideas of authentic leadership have evolved and academics are continuously researching the theory and its validity further. The emphasis of the theory is on the leader’s legitimacy and how this can be strengthened through an honest relationship with subordinates. The theory values opinions and the theory has a strong ethical foundation, just as the concept of authenticity has had throughout history.Before we start examining the core elements of authentic relationship, it’s auspicious to point out the current three theoretical foundations. Authentic leadership can be viewed through three different ideas:In trapersonal definition â€" In this model, the leader and the leader’s characteristics are about nurturing the inner qualities of yourself.Developmental definition â€" The model, which is the most prevalent, notes that the leader might not have set inner traits, but that these characteristics are developed and trained.Interpersonal definition â€" In the third model, the authentic style is not dependent on the leader’s actions, but also the group’s response.Interestingly, authentic leadership is not always seen inconclusive of other leadership theories. Bruce J. Avolio and Fred Luthans explored the idea of authentic leadership as the root construct of other leadership theories in The High Impact Leader. According to Avolio and Luthans, authentic leadership can manifest as directive, participative or even transformational leadership.THE CORE ELEMENTS OF AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIPLet’s turn our attention to the core elements of the leadership style. First, we’ll briefly explore the concept of authenticity, before outlining the four core components of authentic leadership. Later in this section, we’ll also explain some of the different ways authenticity can be measured.What is authenticity?To understand authentic leadership, you must naturally define authenticity. The word authentic can be rather difficult, as it has become a fad. Self-proclamations of authenticity tend to take place in the world of politics, entertainment and business. In her New York Times article, Stephanie Rosenbloom gave examples of celebrities claiming their authenticity. For instance, Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson, had told another newspaper, “If you fear what people think about you, then you are not being authentic”.But authentic leadership isn’t about self-proclamation, but rather showing authenticity through one’s actions and behaviors. Instead of stating “I’m always true to myself”, authentic leadership questions at every step what behavior they are presenting â€" n ot by trying to be authentic, but being self-aware. In order for you to become an authentic leader, you need to first achieve clarity about your inner self and then start showcasing the actual self through your actions. Furthermore, as you’ll see later in this section, self-assessment of your authenticity isn’t often at the core of authentic leadership, but instead subordinates get to voice how they perceive the leader’s authenticity levels.There are essentially three cornerstones of authenticity in terms of authentic leadership. These are:Being true to yourself and your values.Being open with other people.Doing the right thing, in operational and moral terms, not in terms of what is good for you as a leader.The important point to remember about authenticity and authentic leadership is how it’s not a free pass to behave however you want or even make the leadership about you. Brooke Vuckovic, adjunct lecturer of leadership coaching at the Kellogg School, said in an interview, “Authenticity is not a license to be excessively focused on the self. It’s about being aligned with your character and values in order to lead effectively.”The four componentsThere are four core components of authentic leadership: self-awareness, internalized moral perspective, balanced processing and relational transparency. F.O. Walumba et al discussed these four elements in their research paper Authentic Leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure in 2008.Their paper was based on limited empirical data, which suggested authentic leadership relies on the four elements and these components are ultimately the aspects, which strengthen this model for operational use.Component #1: Self-awarenessSelf-awareness relates closely to the Ancient Greek’s idea of “knowing thyself”. It’s about understanding your own inner and outer qualities and how these relate to your being a leader. Furthermore, the component is crucial if you want to develop the other th ree areas of authentic leadership.Self-awareness in authentic leadership can be manifested in a number of ways such as:Knowing your strengths and weaknessesUnderstanding the self is a multi-layered conceptLearning about your impact on other people and vice versaDeveloping a continuous self-exposure and development processAuthentic leadership is not about creating a façade, but it asks for the leader, as well as the follower, to be genuine. In an authentic leadership environment, mistakes are not hidden or shrugged away. Weaknesses are life lessons to be learned and the self-actualization is a constant struggle, which will manifest in mistakes and successes.Bruce J. Avolio and Tara S. Wernsing highlighted in the 2008 essay Practicing Authentic Leadership three ways authentic leaders practice self-awareness:Actively seeking feedback from the environmentUsing self-reflection as a way to understand their behaviorEngaging in self-observation to stay aware of feelings at all times[slides hare id=17471993doc=emotionalentrepreneurmarch2013-130321175048-phpapp01w=640h=330]Component #2: Internalized moral perspectiveThe second core component of authentic leadership relates to doing the right thing. As mentioned earlier, authentic leadership is closely related to ethics and especially the concern of fairness. The theory has always had a strong psychological and moral component.Furthermore, the moral perspective on leadership and the different behaviors it brings about is not based on external factors. The moral perspective is not something the authentic leader finds imposed upon him or her by the organization or even society. Instead, the self-regulatory behavior is self-imposed and comes from the leaders internalized moral values.Component #3: Balanced processingThe authentic leadership doesn’t just seek to make morally correct decisions, but to be fair-minded during the process. The leadership is based on openness and fairness; on an environment where opinions are no t just welcomed but also encouraged. The idea is to ensure opposing viewpoints will be voiced before the leader, sometimes together with subordinates, considers the actions.According to Kevin Kruse, self-claimed serial entrepreneur, the ability to listen and consider different viewpoints does not make authentic leadership “soft”. In his Forbes article, Kruse said authentic leaders “are able to put the mission and the goals of the organization ahead of their own self-interest”. Therefore, authentic leadership focuses on the collective objectives and understands common knowledge and diversity in opinion can help achieve these more clearly.The key to balanced processing is the understanding of bias. To authentic leaders, people’s opinions are based on biased processing of information. This doesn’t mean anything negative per se, but just reinforces the leaders need to understand two things. First, that his or her own ideas are responses to certain triggers, and second, that seeking multiple opinions can provide better understanding of an issue in question. Competing perspectives can yield better results than focusing on cohesion of opinions.Component #4: Relational transparencyFinally, authentic leadership rests on the concept of genuineness. When authentic leaders communicate and act, they do it honestly. There is no room for hidden agendas or mind-games in authentic leadership. It seeks to create an environment where everyone knows where he or she stands in terms of his or her relations with the leader.Transparency won’t mean the leader should necessarily let his or her emotions take control. As a leader, you can’t always say the first things that come to your mind. Nonetheless, you need to share your thought processes with your subordinates and the decisions that are made, must not be shrouded in mystery.But what is enough transparency? According to Avolio and Luthans,“The more certain you are about your values and beliefs, the more clear you will become about how transparent to act with others. Being transparent may cause feelings of vulnerability at times but should not make you so vulnerable as to invoke anxiety or invite exploitation from others.”Different ways to measure authenticitySince authentic leadership is closely tied to behaviors and positive psychology, it’s drawn attention for qualitative research and measurement. Academics and proponents of the theory have sought to measure the levels of authenticity leaders highlight. Four distinct measurements and scales have appeared out of these experiments.Way 1: Leader Authenticity Scale (LAS)The first attempt at measuring authenticity came in the form of the Leader Authenticity Scale (LAS). The 32-item questionnaire measures tendencies such as:Genuine behavior in the face of job titlesAcknowledgement of accountability when mistakes are madeAbility to avoid manipulation of subordinatesThe scale has mainly been used in educational environment, measuring how schoo ls are organized. The scale’s validity has later been criticized for generalization.Way 2: Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ)The Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) surveys the subordinates in order to find the authenticity levels of the leader. The measure is specifically designed with the authentic leadership theory in mind and therefore it focuses on the major four core elements of the theory: self-awareness, relational transparency, internalized moral perspective and balanced processing.In terms of academic research of the theory, ALQ is the most commonly used and preferred scale. The survey can be bought and used either as a self-assessment tool or for measuring multiple leaders or supervisors at once. You can find it online at Mind Garden, for example.Way 3: Authentic Leadership Inventory (ALI)A relatively recent scale, the Authentic Leadership Inventory, came out in 2011. Like ALQ, ALI surveys subordinates in order to measure the authentic leadership behaviours o f the leader. The measure builds on the research done with ALQ and the findings it has made in terms of authenticity.Nonetheless, research has shown problems with the technique and the reliability of the results. As the measurement is free for everyone, the scale has received plenty of attention, despite this criticism.Way 4: Authenticity Inventory (AI:3)The final way to measure is not entirely a leadership measure, but more of a survey to test individual authenticity. It can therefore be a helpful addition to testing your authenticity levels.Different to the above measures, the AI:3 tends to also emphasize the link between well-being and authenticity. It pays more attention to the philosophical aspect of authenticity and self-awareness, rather than just measuring your approach to tasks and leadership.THE QUALITIES OF AN AUTHENTIC LEADERThe above section highlighted the core components of authentic leadership and explained the different ways authenticity can be measured. But what ma kes a leader authentic? What are the qualities you should aim to strengthen if you want to be more authentic?In this section, we’ll explore the core characteristics of authentic leader and the principles that should guide your leadership as an authentic leader.The core characteristicsAuthenticity manifests in different ways, but there are a few essential characteristics and qualities authentic leaders should focus on. While the following five characteristics are often essential for authentic leadership, the key to being a leader with authenticity is proper understanding of yourself. You must also recognize that personal development, just like authentic leadership, is an on-going journey.Self-awareAs mentioned above, self-awareness is the ultimate key to authentic leadership. If you want to become an authentic leader then you must know your personal traits and values inside out. You can’t be true to yourself if you don’t know who you are.Self-awareness sounds easier than it is. Studies have highlighted how the human mind is capable of self-deception. Denial and narcissistic qualities are not just odd phenomena; they occur in most of us. But for authentic leader, the objective is to limit the behavior and to be aware of the moments when you might be ‘cheating yourself’.Self-awareness can be enhanced by understanding your strengths and weaknesses and by studying your behavioral patterns. In most cases, this means looking at your individual circumstances and the past events that might have led to you to develop certain negative or positive patterns of behavior. As George stated in his blog post, “people are not born as jerks”.Authentic leaders are able to understand the negative behaviors and reframe the experiences into a positive format. For instance, being defensive doesn’t have to be a negative characteristic, but you can turn it into a positive by understanding why you are defensive, noticing the situations that make you defensive, and examini ng the impact of your defensiveness.Brenda Booth, a clinical professor of management at the Kellogg School, put it well, when she said,“[authentic leadership] is about being comfortable in your own skin so you can lead the organization in a way where you do not feel ethically compromised or like a charlatan”.GenuineSelf-awareness also requires a level of honesty from the leader. As a leader, you shouldn’t be trying to change your behavior or hiding your true self. People can pick up quite quickly when someone is being honest and when they are not. As a leader, you must ensure your subordinates trust you and if you aren’t genuine, then building this trust might be harder. In True North, George points out an important distinction between being genuine and being perfect. Authentic leadership isn’t about perfection or “letting the expectations of other people guide them”, but the genuine approach to trusting one’s inner capabilities and vision in guiding the group. A gen uine leader will acknowledge mistakes and shortcomings. But it is precisely this connection, which helps them empower others.Result-oriented and task-drivenAuthentic leaders are result-oriented and task-driven. They understand the objectives of organizations, but they don’t push towards profitability and productivity by any means necessary. They understand the importance of teamwork in order to achieve those objectives.The authentic leader understands that flexibility can get things done faster, because different tasks and different people require different things. In order to achieve certain tasks, a leader might use a mentoring approach, while at other times a more directing approach is needed. Therefore, authentic leaders need to implement a level of situational leadership.Result-orientation requires a great deal of knowledge. An authentic leader must therefore also be well aware of the operational goals and things such as industry trends. You must be willing to learn and liste n to different opinions regarding the objectives in order to pick up the best ways forward.Furthermore, Bennis wrote in the introduction of the revised edition of his On Becoming a Leader that today’s leaders must have ‘adaptive capacity’. To Bennis, this means the ability to make decisions and later measure the effectiveness, instead of waiting to analyze the situation before acting. For this to yield the best results, an authentic leader must be on top of tasks and the desired outcomes continuously.FocusedAuthentic leaders must be focused. As George’s three-step pathway to leadership highlights, authentic leadership takes years of experience and personal growth. You therefore must be able to see the end-goal and outline this vision for your subordinates. According to George, “Without a real sense of purpose, leaders are at the mercy of their egos and narcissistic vulnerabilities”.Staying focused on the face of different challenges can be difficult. But the more self-aw are you are about your values and the objectives you need to accomplish, the better you become at draining out the unnecessary aspects around you. Therefore, to become more focused, you need to continually re-evaluate and re-assess your own goals, behavior and those of people around you.EmpatheticFinally, an authentic leader has to showcase high-levels of empathy towards other people. George writes in True North that leaders can grow as authentic leaders when they “are more concerned about serving others than they are about their own success or recognition”. Authentic leader wants to empower others, instead of focusing on their own needs.Betsy Myers, founding director of the Center for Women and Business at Bentley University, writes in her book Take the Lead: Motivate, Inspire, and Bring Out the Best in Yourself and Everyone Around You that “leadership is about how you make people feel”. In order to do so, you must treat them genuinely and honestly.Being more empathetic is ultimately about understanding other people’s needs and stepping into their shoes. This can be enhanced through better communication and analysis of your own feelings. Furthermore, you should aim to improve your emotional intelligence, which you can learn more about from the below video. Five principles for authentic leadersIn order to enhance the above characteristics and to start leading in authentic manner, you need to implement core principles to guide your way. Kevin Cashman, CEO of LeaderSource and executive of Leader Insitute, recommends in his 1998 book Leadership from the Inside Out five principles authentic leaders should follow.Principle #1: Know yourself authenticallyThe first principle is about self-awareness and integrity. It builds on the idea that instead of paying attention to what others are doing, a leader should focus on his or her own behavior. In essence, be the kind of leader and employee, you want others to be.As George wrote in 2007, “the harder person y ou will ever have to lead is yourself”. If you know yourself and your behaviors, you can set an example and inspire others with your example.Principle #2: Listen authenticallyAccording to Cashman, the second principle relies on the principle of psychological reciprocity: if you want to influence others, you must open yourself up to their influence.When you listen to others authentically, you are open the ideas and objectives of the other person, and you allow them to perhaps teach you something.Principle #3: Express authenticallyExpressing authentically means talking with a genuine voice. To Cashman, it’s about avoiding the need to refine your style or trying to hold on to our sense of integrity at all times. Authentic expression allows subordinates to see the leader is talking from the heart and from experience, even if the presentation isn’t perfectly worded.Authentic expression is closely linked with the idea of creating value. While writers, like George, acknowledge that a uthentic leaders don’t just say whatever comes to mind, but use emotional intelligence to decide how to say something, it still doesn’t mean you don’t go straight to the point.The difference of saying whatever and expressing your opinion authentically is in the creation of value. Authentic leader says things in a way that lead to a positive outcome. For example, instead of telling someone they have been lazy in getting the report done, authentic leader would share tips on how the report can be finished quicker and point out to the negative impact of not achieving objectives.Principle #4: Appreciate authenticallyAppreciating authentically can, according to Cashman, be part of authentic expression. It focuses on creating value because appreciation tends to make people feel better about themselves and motivate them to work harder.By appreciating someone, you can boost his or her sense of self-worth and development. It results in long-term positive value, instead of short-term val ue provided by criticism.[slideshare id=58864774doc=10freshideasforemployeeappreciationday-160229171931w=640h=330]Principle #5: Serve authenticallyFinally, Cashman recommends authentic leaders to serve authentically. The idea is ultimately to serve instead of control, whether it is the subordinates, the customers or society as whole. It’s about understanding the interdependence of people in organizations and larger communities.An authentic leader must use the below building blocks in order tosucceed. © Shutterstock | raevasADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIPAuthentic leadership, although still a new theory, has been closely reviewed and analyzed. Many of its proponents focus on the positive advantages the leadership style can provide to an organization, while critics point out to some obvious failings in the approach. Let’s turn our attention to both arguments.Advantages of authentic leadershipOne of the first benefits of authentic leadership is the enhanced relational engagement it brings about. Since the focus is on objectives and a person’s inner behaviors and values, the leader is more able to maintain trust and cohesion among the group. The focus is on empowering the employees and guiding them through the tasks in an empathetic and honest manner.George points out to this importance of trust in True North. He points to the examples of Enron, WorldCom and Tyco and the CEOs who “put their companies at risk by focusing on the trappings and spoils of leade rship”. George went on to write how trust is not built by trying to appear authentic or caring, but highlighting one’s inner values.The relational engagement is closely related to the second positive of authentic leadership: it’s ability to build positive and rewarding relationships. The focus on employee-leader relations is on the development and on listening to people’s ideas and thoughts. The open relationship, which doesn’t mean everything is always happiness and agreement, creates an authentic environment, where people know their place in the organization and the direction the team is working towards. Although authentic leadership means the leader is the ultimate decider, the style invites and relishes the opportunities of listening to other people’s opinions. The collaborative environment can improve employee satisfaction and make them feel like equal members of the group.In addition, proponents of authentic leadership highlight the consistency authentic leadership style can provide for an organization. It is the leader’s inner values, combined with the operational objectives of the organization, which are at the heart of the way the team operates. This means that subordinates know what to expect in times of trouble and sunshine. If the leader is passionate about sustainability, then it will always provide a backdrop to everything the organization does. The values provide stability and consistency to an organization. More importantly, as Northouse wrote in his book, “Authentic leaders do not compromise their values, but rather use those situations to strengthen their values”.Finally, authentic leadership tends to guarantee the ethical and moral standards are high. Since the style emphasizes the use of morality as the guidance for leadership, the organization can have a stronger ethical footing. According to George’s surveys of leaders, the common problems of morality don’t arise among ethical leaders. As he writes in the book, authe ntic leaders don’t seek self-gain, but want the organization to succeed and prosper, along with the subordinates.A good example of this is Howard Schultz and Starbucks. Because of Schultz’ own experience with the problems of employee healthcare, he built his company around the area that all employees, even those working part-time, should have access to healthcare options. He used his personal values and life experiences as guidance and created a company, which reflected these values.Disadvantages of authentic leadershipUndoubtedly, the leadership theory’s biggest disadvantage is its infancy. The authentic leadership theory doesn’t have a coherent or unified theory, with different authors adding their own flavor to what it means to be an authentic leader. Therefore, proper analysis of the benefits and the measuring of authenticity can be difficult.Furthermore, authors such as Northouse question the ambiguity around specific context, such as authentic leadership’s moral comp ass. In Leadership: Theory and Practice, Northouse pointed out, “Whereas authentic leadership implies that leaders are motivated by higher-order end values such as justice and community, the way that these values function to influence authentic leadership is not clear”.In addition to this dilemma, the moral component can cause contradicting objectives within an organization. The leader’s values might not always align with what is right for the organization or its shareholders. In fact, the needs of the subordinates and other stakeholders might not always meet. Therefore, a leader might find him- or herself in a situation where they have to either sacrifice their inner value of providing employee bonuses or provide these bonuses in order to grow the company’s sale potential.But could authentic leadership also reveal the ‘inner jerk’ of a leader? Although George has said that authenticity shouldn’t allow you to be a jerk, the focus on honesty might not be suitable for al l situations. In his blog post, Peter Stark, President of Peter Barron Stark Companies, writes about examples where the team has failed to meet its targets and when authentic leadership might not provide the right answers. He goes on to say,“We don’t all have a 100% positive outlook and attitude every single day, but it is still our job as leaders to role-model and create a positive workplace environment. You may be genuinely honest and decide to share your anger over a team member’s mistake or shortcoming. Honesty is great, but in this situation, the employee needs a leader who can give feedback in a way that is helpful and well-received.”Finally, there is a danger authentic leadership might hinder an organizations ability to make quick decisions. As the leader wants to gather feedback and listen to other opinions before using his or her judgment, the speed at which these decisions are taken can be jeopardized.Overall, the leadership style can take years to develop. As Geor ge’s three-step pathway to authentic leadership shows, you will need to gain experience and self-develop your style and understanding of your values long before you can start considering yourself as a leader or an authentic leader. But leadership doesn’t always allow the luxury of time. You might find yourself surrounded by a situation that requires leadership and you simply need to step up and take the necessary measures. Without proper self-knowledge, you might not be able to implement a true authentic leadership style in this situation.EXAMPLES OF FAMOUS AUTHENTIC LEADERSTo gain an insight into what authentic leadership looks like in action, you must examine examples of famous authentic leaders. In this section, we’ll examine four examples of authentic leaders and how they have shaped their respective organizations as well.Martin Luther King, Jr.Martin Luther King Jr. is often considered to have been an authentic leader. The prominent civil rights activist is most known for his “I have a dream” speech, which reads out as an authentic vision of the future he hoped to achieve.Avolio and Wernsig point out to another example of King’s authentic approach to leadership in their 2008 essay Practicing Authentic Leadership. During an interview on the Mike Douglas Show, King explained his views on the Vietnam War. He said:“A man of conscience can never be a consensus leader…he doesn’t take a stand in order to search for consensus. He is ultimately a molder of consensus. I’ve always said a measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and moments of convenience, but where he stands in moments of challenge and moments of controversyI’m much more concerned about keeping favour with these principles than keeping favor with a person who may misunderstand a position I take.”The above quote perfectly highlights the essence of authentic leadership. The focus is on understanding what your inner values are and using them to guide your de cisions. The leadership style understands that tough decisions must be made and not everyone might benefit from the decisions. Eleanor RooseveltThe US First Lady is another historical example of an authentic leader. Roosevelt spent her time fighting for the equal treatment of humans, with her big achievement being the creation of the United Nations’ international code for human rights.Roosevelt didn’t just preach about treating people with dignity and compassion. She showcased this in her personal life, during a difficult time. When her husband, President Roosevelt, died, she returned to Washington D.C. from her holiday only to be advised Franklin had been continuing his long-time affair.Furthermore, Eleanor’s daughter had been aiding his father in the affair. A few months later, Roosevelt found a portrait of her husband, which was to be for his girlfriend. Instead of throwing it out or ripping it to pieces, she wrote a note to his lover and sent her the portrait, explaining t hat she knew he must have meant a lot for her.Roosevelt lived by her own values, even when the situation was deeply hurtful for her. She showcased great empathy, not just in her professional career, but in her private life as well.Warrant Buffett / Berkshire HathawayThe world’s most renowned businessman is an example of an authentic leader; especially in terms of the way, he has run Berkshire Hathaway. He has shown strong moral compass in how he treats his position in the company and his personal wealth.For starters, Buffett doesn’t draw a huge salary from the company, relying on around $100,000 annual salary. Furthermore, he’s showcased relational transparency by investing in companies and allowing the leaders of these organisations to get on with the job. He places trust on other people.Buffett has given away from a large chunk of his fortune, around $50 billion for the Gates Foundation, as a way to give back to the larger community. To Buffet, wealth is a tool for creating good rather than the end objective he wants to read.The investor was once interviewed by a class of students who wanted to know about who Buffet turns to for advice. His answer perfectly highlights his authentic leadership qualities:“Well, usually I look in the mirror, to be totally honest. The nature of what I do means I have to think pretty much independently because if I take a poll, in effect, I’m gonna do whatever everybody else is doing and I don’t think much of that usually in investments; and so I have to have an environment and I have to have the temperament personally that lets me think for myself.”Ed Whitacre / GMGM faced its biggest financial troubles in 2008, as the global economy sank. While the company declared bankruptcy in early 2009, the US President Barack Obama appointed Ed Whitacre to the CEO position. Whitacre had previously saved ATT from its problems, and he was now embarking on a new challenge.Within a year, Whitacre had turned around the automobile company, with much of it down to his authentic style. The style wasn’t just present in the way he led his subordinates, he also sought to build trust with the customers by appearing in ads and offering a cash back option for customers.Whitacre’s authentic style is even evident from his decision to step down after the short leadership period. He had told this to be his intention from the start. “It was my plan â€" to help return this company to greatness â€" and not to stay a day beyond that,” he stated.FINAL THOUGHTSAuthentic leadership is a theory born out of the frustrations of the failings of the corporate world. Its focus and emphasis demonstrates the moral and ethical problems corporations have found themselves in, with leaders often showcasing more care for their own wellbeing rather than the common good.Considering the levels of frustration, it’s no wonder the idea of an authentic and genuine leader has become so popular. An authentic leader would use his or her int ernal values as a guide to making decisions that consider the corporate objectives, but also the wellbeing of his or her subordinates. Rather than focusing on short-term goals and gains, authentic leadership wants to empower people with a long-term vision. As the examples of authentic leaders have shown us, authentic leadership sets out a vision and works towards it, even when it might take years to accomplish.But the relative youth of the movement has caused problems for the movement. Because it relies heavily on concepts such as morality and authenticity, there will be people who have different opinions on what it truly means to be an authentic leader. How do you define your moral values? What if you truly believe in things others don’t view ethical or good? These are the issues the theory must solve in order to move forward.Nonetheless, authentic leadership provides one idealistic view on what leadership can offer at its best. Its focus on building genuine relationship and crea ting an environment based on trust is useful for most organizations.

Persuasive Techniques Used in Michael Jacksons Eulogy...

Persuasion is a commonly used communication technique that allows us to socially influence a certain topic positively or negatively. Its purpose is to help affirm or nullify an idea, belief or attitude. Sometimes the exact topic is very detectable in communication such as during debates but other times it displayed a little more subtly. Persuasion is more than just verbally speaking. Non-verbal communication such as body language, tone and pitch of the voice can also add to the affirmation of the topic. The setting and location also help encourage the acceptance of what is being persuaded. In Michael Jackson’s eulogy delivered by Al Sharpton, a subtle persuasion speech was also given. He wanted us to know that although a special person†¦show more content†¦Many would agree that a really great candidate was chosen to give Michael’s eulogy. When you think of Al Sharpton, a good image comes to mind because his ethos is very reputable. Not only is this man well-known to the general population, he is particularly known in the black community. The Reverend Al Sharpton is known mainly known for being a civil rights advocate, Baptist minister, and radio talk show host. He is also known for making many appearances on news television channels such as MSNBC. In 2004, he was a democratic nominee for the presidential election. Sharpton is famous for being loyal to many things or ideas that he supports; a loyalty that is so strong it can lead him to jail. Although he is criticized by some who believe he is to blame for a continued racial separation, many peopl e give him admiration for being a great activist. He knows how to command the attention of people and to get them to listen to what he has to say, especially on very delicate matters. Because of his well-known credentials, it wasn’t hard to see why he was asked to speak. The emotion in Sharpton’s voice while delivering his eulogy showed that he not only cared about Michael as a public icon, but also as person; he was a dear friend to him. While speaking, he showed a compassion and understanding to the family of Michael. He made it clear that he was sensitive to their loss and that he was empathic because their loss was just

Treatment And Diagnosis Of Blood Diseases - 907 Words

Though modern medicine has advanced significantly in the prevailing years, the treatment and diagnosis of disease can still elude even the best of doctors. Blood diseases, in particular, take an inordinate amount of testing to diagnose, and many times, are only partially treatable. I believe that in the future, a machine could be created that streamlines this process and could treat certain blood diseases entirely. The technology already exists, though it hasn’t yet been implemented in this fashion. What if there was a way to eradicate certain diseases entirely from the blood, when previously, those diseases could only be treated temporarily? The machine I’ve theorized, at its most basic level, is simply a blood purification device. However, this system would purify the blood not just at the cursory level, but on a cellular level. The technology that would be used as the basis of this device has already been developed by Drexel University. They have invented a way to us e carbon nanotubes as separation channels to create a process called liquid-liquid extraction, which separates dissimilar cells despite solubility. Ideally, this technology could be implemented into a machine to separate foreign, diseased bodies from otherwise healthy blood cells. The process could potentially negate the need for multiple blood tests, stains, and screenings to diagnose a blood condition. Since a qualified doctor could analyze the diseased bodies by themselves, without interference from otherShow MoreRelatedDiscussion on Otitis Externa1050 Words   |  5 Pages In discussing otitis externa, the diagnosis can be explained by misdiagnosis. Some patients are diabetic immunocompromised with severe pain in the ear should have necrotizing OE excluded by an otolaryngologist. Otitis externa is an inflammation or infection of the external auditory canal, the auricle, or both. It is a common disease that can be found in all age groups. OE usually represents an acute bacterial infection of the skin of the ear canal (most commonly attributable to PseudomonasRead MoreDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 Diabetes1628 Words   |  7 PagesDiabetes mellitus type 2, also know as type 2 Diabetes or noninsulin dependent diabetes, is a disease that effects the body systemically. Type 2 diabetes is a disorder in which cells become resistant to insulin and can no longer bind it properly to reduce blood sugar. The result of this is elevated glucose levels in the circulating blood that leads to endothelial injury in all regions of the body. Primary damages occur in the kidneys, cardiovascular, and digestive systems. According to â€Å"Annual NumberRead MoreDiscussion. Cause. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Is Complex1711 Words   |  7 Pages Discussion Cause Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is complex autoimmune disease caused by a combination of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. The body’s autoimmune cells fail to distinguish a diseased cell or foreign organism from its own healthy cells. Consequently, the autoimmune system attacks its own cells causing inflammation in multiple systems including; the kidneys, skin, heart, lungs, hematopoetic, and nervous system. An estimation of 20 – 100 differentRead MoreDo Calcium Channel Blockers Play A Role For Preventing Hypertensive Encephalopathy?1618 Words   |  7 PagesEnd Stage renal disease, Stroke, and Ischemic heart disease. The Hypertension is responsible for almost half of the deaths related to the Ischemic heart disease and stroke. (3) Hypertensive emergency has a very high mortality rate. If untreated, it can lead to irreversible neurologic complications such as strokes. This may cause serious disabilities, and may eventually end with death; however, this can be prevented with better control of the blood pressure. By controlling the blood pressure, theRead MoreA Short Note On Cardiomyopathy And Humans And Canines1121 Words   |  5 PagesCardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death in both humans and canines. Cardiomyopathy is a disease in which the heart muscles become enlarged, inflexible, and dense. Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a specific type of Cardiomyopathy in which only the muscles in the ventricles of the heart become enlarged and weakened. DCM normally begins in the left ventricle, but it can spread to the right ventricle as well; at that point, the heart works harder and thus cannot efficiently pump blood [3]Read MoreHow Valvular Disease Is Responsible For More Than 22 000 Deaths954 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"Valvular heart disease is responsible for more than 22 000 deaths each year in the United States. (Patel, Green et al 2014). Thousands of people live long and healthy lives not knowing the they have valvular disease. Due to this, majority of these deaths are from the elderly population. Those who have succumbed to this disease, apart from those who attained it due to congenital reasons, usually have another disease of the heart or vascular system such as coronary disease or hypertension. The riskRead MoreCause. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Is Complex Autoimmune1734 Words   |  7 PagesCause Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is complex autoimmune disease caused by a combination of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. The body’s autoimmune cells fail to distinguish a diseased cell or foreign organism from its own healthy cells. Consequently, the autoimmune system attacks its own cells, causing inflammation in multiple systems including; the kidneys, skin, heart, lungs, hematopoetic, and nervous system. An estimation of 20 to 100 different genetic factors make a personRead MoreThe Relationship Between Cushing Disease And Cushing Syndrome1249 Words   |  5 Pageslevels of any of these hormones can lead to a number of disease states. One of these hormones is cortisol which is produced by the adrenal gland. Excess levels of cortisol can manifest in Cushing disease and Cushing syndrome, with a variety of symptoms, test methods and treatments. It is important to distinguish between Cushing disease and Cushing syndrome. While both are based on high levels of cortisol circulating in the body, Cushing disease is specifically caused by a generally benign tumor ofRead MoreDiabetes Mellitus ( Dm ) Is One Of The Most Prevalent Diseases Affecting The Endocrine System1636 Words   |  7 PagesDiabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent diseases affecting the endocrine system. The incidence of DM in the United States has reached over 29 million citizens (Diabetes Latest, 2014). Of the 29 million, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) estimate that 1 in 4 are unaware of their condition. DM can be categorized into three different diseases: Type One, Type Two, and Gestational. Types one and two are diagnosed anytime throughout a patient’s life; gestational is DM thatRead MoreNursing Interventions And Implications For Nursing Practice888 Words   |  4 PagesNursing intervention of patients with valvular disease incorporates a number of nursing diagnoses. Nursing management interventions mainly focus on achieving adequate cardiac output, maintaining fluid balance and education on the patient and the family members. Cardiac output Patients suffering from cardiac valvular disease have low cardiac output. It occurs due to decrease in the forward flow of blood through a stenotic valve, bidirectional flow of blood across the already incompetent valves or any

The Movie Crash Free Essays

I don’t normally review English movies coz they don’t affect me emotionally, as much as Indians movies do. Reviewing for me is more an emotion driven act than a critical, objective exercise. Crash is one of the few English movies, out of the tons I’ve watched this year, that really touched an emotional chord. We will write a custom essay sample on The Movie Crash or any similar topic only for you Order Now Crash – ’’Moving at the speed of life, we are bound to collide with each other. ’’†¦This is the tagline for the movie. This movie is set in Los Angeles and explores tense racial relations amongst the various communities that exist in LA. Crash is an ensemble piece in which the stories of different characters intersect and intertwine†¦kinda like Tom Cruise’s Magnolia. Each of the sub-stories involves racism, which is the central theme of the film. Other than racism, the film also highlights the alienation and isolation of the individual in a big city. The title â€Å"Crash† comes from the fact that the movie is full of car crashes and people colliding into one another, which, as one of the central characters in the movie states, seems to have become the only way people connect with each other today. Plot  Ã¢â‚¬â€œ It is hard to outline a plot here. There is so much going on in the movie at all times, so many different characters, so many plot twists. You have Sandra Bullock and Brendan Fraser playing a white, upwardly mobile couple who are victims of a car-jacking, at the hands of a couple of black guys, further increasing their prejudices. You have the black car-jackers, Ludacris (the hip hop star) and Larenz Tate, who are quite unrepentant about what they’ve done, who feel as long as they are not robbing their own community they are â€Å"Aw.. iight†. Then there is a Korean guy who’s run down by these car jackers while they are speeding away. As the audience, you are tempted to feel sorry for the Korean guy, but maybe he’s not a victim after all†¦maybe he’s involved in crimes even greater than stealing. There is Matt Dillon, as a frustrated, stressed traffic cop, who pulls over a black couple for a very trivial reason and harasses them unforgivably just because â€Å"he can† (very bollywood, corrupt cop style). Ryan Philippe plays his partner, who is quite disturbed by Matt’s behaviour, but is too much of a rookie to have a say. Don Cheadle plays an upright black cop, who is kind of at the centre of this movie, almost like the conscience of the movie, but he too has his own prejudices, and is not above stereotyping his Hispanic girlfriend. These are only some of the subplots in a very busy storyline. If this sounds complicated on paper, well, it is. I had to watch this movie thrice to get all the subplots. But like a patchwork quilt, the mismatched parts and pieces all come together to create a whole that’s far more significant — and, thankfully, understandable — than the mere sum of its parts. None of the characters are completely bad or completely good†¦they all have their shades of grey, and most of them have a chance to play the perpetrator of racial prejudice and the victim of it†¦. †¦which is pretty true to life. Casting  Ã¢â‚¬â€œ The casting of the movie is truly inspired. Sandra Bullock, Brendan Fraser, Ludacris†¦artists who haven’t done roles like this before, are wonderful. Don Cheadle is nothing less than brilliant. In one scene, he doesn’t say a word; he simply walks away. And yet the look of naked anguish on his face actually brought me physical pain as my heart broke for him. Matt Dillon is surprisingly good as a man who exemplifies both the worst and the best of humankind. In fact, there’s not a bad, or even a mediocre, performance in the film. Crash actually uses its many facets to tell a story of mutual racial intolerance and of snap judgments based on nothing more or less than skin color or an accent. It seems easier for us to deal with a stereotype than to take the time to get to know someone. I guess what I felt after watching the movie was that I was just as guilty of racism as the next person. This is not a movie you’ll walk away from with a smile, but you will leave with something to think about and discuss for days to come. It also made me think about the alienation factor, which is so prominent in Western society, and maybe in some big cities in India as well. I watched this movie with my mother in tow, who likes to â€Å"talk† movies as much as I do. When we left the hall, we found ourselves strangely silent, looking around us, scrutinizing other people who’d watched this movie in the theatre, wondering what they felt, trying to eavesdrop on their conversation, being very â€Å"racially† aware, and yet wanting to connect. We weren’t the only ones, we were being similarly checked out by other movie goers! Normally, at least outside India, one doesn’t really â€Å"look† at other people in the hall†¦one is content to discuss the film with whoever you’ve been watching it with and then go about your business. So I guess this film did get its message across really well. Do watch this film. It will make you think and feel. Please do comment on this review†¦ even if you havent seen this movie, do you have any opinions on some of the themes this movie addresses? How to cite The Movie Crash, Essay examples

The WallClassic Reviews by Pink Floyd free essay sample

You probably shouldve seen this coming. For those of you who know, I will be doing almost nothing but progressive rock and metal. You really cant have a proper series of these album reviews without doing at least one review of the Prog Giants:Rush, Yes, and Pink Floyd. It would be a son if this wasnt the case. But moving on here;Pink Floyd is a progressive rock band that formed in the 60s with more of an underground, psychedelic rock in that time. Since Meddle in `71 however, that route was forever changed for the better. Then Dark Side of The Moon came and took the world by storm forever revolutionizing the way people look at music today. However were not going to be talking about that instead well be talking about the last album with Roger Waters and their last album of the 70s. We will write a custom essay sample on The Wall:Classic Reviews by Pink Floyd or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The Wall was released in 1979 to represent the departure of Roger Waters and to also make an album up to Dark Side of the Moon standards, which they managed to do easily. Following a story similar to a King Crimson album a decade prior called In The Court of the Crimson King where the protagonist Pink goes gets arrested and is set free for whatever reason. Though the similarities end there, Pink also goes through character changes as he gets older and eventually becomes a rock star as well. This 80 minute masterpiece is able to convey alot of emotion all throughout the album. Every tracks fits right into the next and, did I mention there are 26 tracks? Ok, while most are one or two minute transitions, the continue the story very well. Of course there have to be notable tracks like Another Brick In The Wall, Goodbye Blue Sky, In The Flesh(2nd one), Comfortably Numb, Hey You and Run Like Hell all make the story that much more vivid. Also, in Goodbye Blue Sky, I find a riff to the Meta llica song Fade To Black which is cool but also adds layers of atmosphere to Pink`s independing doom, meaning its very forbodding. Some transitions I wish were made into full length tracks but, maybe its for the better that they stay transitions. One of the best progressive rock albums in my opinion. I give this a 10/10. I am the Grim Reaper, signing off.